Last Update: January 23, 2013
Compliant Refiners
| Company |
Compliant Refiner Location (Effective Date)[1] |
Conflict Sourcing Policy |
| 1. Asahi Pretec Corporation |
a. Saitama Factory, Saitama Prefecture, Japan (May 24, 2012)
b. Amagasaki Factory, Hyogo Prefecture, Japan (May 25, 2012)
c. Technical Research Center, Hyogo Prefecture, Japan (June 5, 2012)
d. Ehime Factory, Ehime Prefecture, Japan (June 6, 2012) |
Conflict Free Policy |
| 2. DOWA |
a. Kosaka Smelting & Refining Co., Ltd., Japan (August 8, 2012)
b. DOWA Metals & Mining Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan
(August 9, 2012) |
Conflict Free Policy |
| 3. Kojima Chemicals Company |
a. Sayama City Factory, Saitama Prefecture, Japan (November 19 - 20, 2012) |
Conflict Free Policy |
| 4. Matsuda Sangyo |
a. Iruma Factory, Saitama Prefecture, Japan (May 22 - 24, 2012)
b. Iruma Second Factory, Saitama Prefecture, Japan (May 22 -24, 2012)
c. Musashi Factory, Saitama Prefecture, Japan (May 22 -24, 2012)
d. R&D Center, Saitama Prefecture, Japan (May 22 -24, 2012) |
Conflict Free Policy |
| 5. Metalor USA Refining Corporation |
a. North Attleboro, Ohio, USA (April 17 - April 19, 2012) |
Conflict Free Policy |
| 6. Metalor Technologies SA |
a. Neuchâtel, Switzerland (May 8 - May 10, 2012) |
Conflict Free Policy |
| 7. Metalor Technologies Hong Kong |
a. Hong Kong, China (May 17 - May 18, 2012) |
Conflict Free Policy |
| 8. Nihon Material Co. LTD |
a. Chiba Prefecture, Japan (August 20 - August 21, 2012) |
Conflict Free Policy |
| 9. Ohio Precious Metals, LLC. |
a. Jackson, Ohio, USA (April 26 – April 27, 2012) |
Conflict Free Policy |
| 10. Perth Mint Refinery |
a. Cloverdale Western Australia (April 4, 2012) |
Conflict Free Policy |
| 11. Royal Canadian Mint |
a. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (February 17, 2012) |
Conflict Free Policy |
| 12. Tanaka Kikinzoku Kogyo K.K. |
a. Kanagawa, Japan (April 12 – April 13, 2012) |
Conflict Free Policy |
Country Level Definitions
Level 1 countries are defined as countries with known active ore production which are not identified as plausible countries for export out of region, smuggling, or transit of conflict minerals.
Level 2A countries are defined as known or plausible countries for export out of region, smuggling, or transit of conflict minerals.
Level 2B countries are defined as the nine countries adjoining the DRC which have been outlined in section 1502 in the Dodd Frank Act.
Level 3 countries are defined as ore sources currently within conflict regions that are potentially supplying ore materials.
Aggregated Data
| Country of Origin |
| Australia (Level 1) |
Japan (Level 1) |
Solomon Island (Level 1) |
| Canada (Level 1) |
Laos (level 1) |
Suriname (Level 1) |
| Fiji (level 1) |
New Zealand (Level 1) |
Thailand (level 1) |
| Guyana (Level 1) |
Papua New Guinea (PNG) (Level 1) |
USA (Level 1) |
| Indonesia (Level 1) |
Philippine (Level 1) |
Vietnam (Level 1) |
| |
Singapore (Level 1) |
|
[1]The CFS assessment is valid for one year. If a Refiner applies for re-assessment before the one year anniversary, it will stay on the list until the completion of the assessment and determination of compliance with the protocol. If the refiner does not re-apply for re-assessment by the one year anniversary, it will be removed from the list until it is found to be compliant with the protocol.
©2013 Electronic Industry Citizenship Coalition, Incorporated and Global e-Sustainability Initiative. All rights reserved.
|
